China is not the Factory of the World

– how a Japanese businessman views China

From 在华6年多的日本商人对中国世界工厂的评价

Translated by EPIN and Jacky

I am a typical Japanese businessman called “the economic animal”.  I have been in china for more than 6 years. During these years, I have successively worked and lived in five cities. I can understand Chinese but cannot speak fluently. I can also get general meaning of Chinese words but cannot write. China is called “Factory of the World.” I have my understanding to this. As far as I know, China’s productivity has been improved a lot. However, there is still a long way for China to go to be factory of the world. 

First, factory of the world does not mean the sweatshop. Some people once compared Japanese to ants, but compared with the hardworking Chinese, Japanese are far behind. There are innumerable household factories in Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta as well as Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. These factories are running on backward technologies, similar products, and slack management. They have low technology and poor efficiency. Their only advantage is that they have employees as tough breed as ants, as submissive as cattle and horses. These workers support the survival of these factories. The workers work more than 10 hours a day, staying in shabby rooms and living the lowest life, without basic social security. They are working on the lowest wages all around the world based on hourly rate. In some piece worker factories, the workers’ average working hours are more than 12 hours a day. They won’t stop unless the supervisor forces them to take a break. In my company, there were some Chinese female cleaners. They worked over 10 hours daily quietly with no grumble and never took a day off. They did not have direct supervisor. Not a single person pushed them to do so. They cherished their jobs greatly, just because they earned a bit higher than those in other factories. We were very surprised when hearing that they sent 80% of the earnings back home. To Japanese perspective, the remained money was insufficient to cover their basic living expense, not to mention the rental and the water bill. I had worked in many Southeast Asian countries. It was very difficult to get the workers work overtime even if in an underdeveloped country, such as Burma. Workers would ask for many extra things. In Philippines, workers would never do such hard works. The Filipinos would take one month break after one month’s working, and would not go to work until they used up the money. In Indonesia, there was no one would engage in such hard work. Therefore, in my opinion, these so-called international manufacturers in China are supported by the tough breed Chinese. They cannot survive elsewhere in the world without Chinese. 

Second, factories without skilled workers cannot meet the standard of factory of the world. In the big cities of Southern and Northern China, large quantity of labor force is waiting for the employment. However, there are very few skillful workers. That’s because most Chinese factories are lack of long-term plans and technology support. Many migrant workers keep changing job year after year. They make shoes this year but sewing clothing the other year. The personnel turnover is huge. There is neither efficient management nor basic profession training. Meanwhile, the factories do not have long-term plans, and often rush to manufacture the same best-selling products. So workers have to learn new skills as the production line shifted. Most of the time, factories would fire the existing workers, and then recruit some new from the market. As a result, most workers do not have chances of working in the same field for a long time; therefore they cannot improve their industrial skills. Japan does not dominant in technology development, but it has an unrivaled highly skilled labor force. They have been engaged in the same jobs for tens of years. Their skillful hands produce the most sophisticated products in the world. Higher learning institutes cannot produce such workers, and it is not possible to train one over short time. It takes years to sharpen their skills. Chinese were more skillful. They have produced superb handicrafts. However, the Chinese factories’ employment pattern does not help train the workers. The Chinese workers have been floating like quicksand year by year. They don’t have the conditions to acquire higher skills.

Third, the size of those factories does not reach the standard of world factory. Most of the factories in China are small and many of them are making the same products. In terms of Japanese standards, those can only be called as workshops. They do not meet the standards of industrialization. The Pearl River Delta area is the densest manufacturing area in China, but its total annual production value of all the factories only equals that of one Japanese big size enterprise. Numerous factories are making the same products independently. As a result, the factories do not have enough work to do and the cost of manufacturing is high. Therefore, the enterprises do not have the funding for research team. They do not have money to invest in technology development. At the same time, the enterprises also have no intention to get more advanced technical equipment due to the low cost of the labor force. In Pearl River Delta area, numerous enterprises, big or small, are making low-tech electrical appliances such as television, microwave oven, air conditioner, refrigerator, telephone and so on. There is no one world famous brand. There are factories engaging in rag trade, headwear and footwear and toys. Also, none of them meets the minimum standard of mass production.

Fourth, low-tech factories cannot meet the standard of world factory. A world famous enterprise usually is able to develop products on its own. Also, it can offer comprehensive services from R & D, manufacturing, to marketing, sales and after-sales support. However, most factories in China basically are just imitating. They are acting for others. They are chained by others in technologies. Foreign companies grip most of the profits. The links between the R & D system and the manufacturing system are broken. Chinese companies are weak in developing new products. They come up with very few self-developed products.

Fifth, Chinese factories’ managements are not efficient and does not meet the standard of world factory. A more advanced production demands a more stringent management. Chinese enterprises lack good management. There are much more factories in China than in Japan, but few Chinese factories are able to produce a complete plant. Most of the equipment is imported. In the Chinese factories, those more advanced equipment are all imported from other countries. China has the ability to produce such complete plant, but it lacks of the management skills. The requirement of making complete plants is different from making mass products. There might be only one complete plant sold in several years. It takes a comprehensive management of resources, manufacturers, specifications, standards, etc to make profits. The whole process is as accurate as assembling finest watches. If one component goes wrong in management, it will increase the cost and decrease the performance. China is short of such precise management. The management of the state-own companies is very bureaucratic and inefficient, while the small companies do not practice good management. I think, if the Airbus is produced in China and managed by Chinese, its cost will be much higher. In my opinion, China does not lack of managers. China needs a good filtering system for talents. A lot of incompetent persons who are incapable, vicious and crafty take the high paid positions. They are good at cutting corner. They impede the development of the good managers.

China has unrivaled tough breed labor in the world, but it lacks of skillful industrial workers. China has more factories than any other countries, but none of them is world-class size. Chinese can make all kinds of products, but they produce few innovative products. China has huge productivity, but it is not able to produce high-tech complete plant.

China has a long way to go to become the real factory of the world. For a long time in the future, China will be only a primary products processing base, not the factory of the world.

Similar Posts

  • |

    How Chinese view Japanese on the net?

    On any Chinese forum, if some one publishes a post which relates to Japan, you can expect it to spur some uproar that bash and attack Japanese.   It is not uncommon that you see something like, “Japanese men are all perverts!!!!!” “Kill all Japanese!!!” “Rape all the Jap’s gals!!!” … You can find many comments worse than…

  • |

    月饼节及新加坡夜市

    昨天是中秋节。有的时候新加坡把中秋节译做“Mooncake Festival”,也许是看中秋期间有很多月饼卖,华人都在吃月饼吧?昨天问一个印度朋友要不要月饼,很意外地,她说“很喜欢”。看来很多人都喜欢月饼,这或许是“Mooncake Festival”的名称来源之一吧。 只不过“Mooncake Festival”让人感觉把中秋变成了个大吃会似的。站在一个文化的立场上去看另一个文化真的很难感受到其中真实的意义。 这段时间是穆斯林的斋戒月期间。本来我以为在斋戒月晚上穆斯林都是躲在家里清心寡欲,在念经。但这段时间新加坡晚上却见到很多pasar malams(马来语:夜市),都是热热闹闹的。 下面的图片就是一个新加坡网友在新加坡东部Changi Road, Geylang Road & Sims Ave晚上拍到的夜市情景。   跟中国的夜市一样,也是人山人海的。   卖很多衣服,这些都是马来传统服装。 这个叫songkok,男人戴的帽子。如果有个男人带的songkok是白色的,就说明他曾经去过麦加朝圣。   烤鸡翅,小吃。 椰子水,热带特点。 新加坡地方热,但本地人总喜欢吃煎、烤的东东。 otah,我现在也喜欢吃了。有点上瘾。   逛夜市就是图热闹,图便宜,图个新奇。居然还有卖汽车的。新币7块一天(35元人民币)就可以买辆车,够便宜。不过没说明要多少天,耍了个滑头。 新加坡夜市有时候也可以讲价,但价钱没有中国的开得那么虚,可以讲的不多。

  • Culture Shock, Courtesy of Duolingo

    这几天在玩多邻国。连着碰到几个例句, “They are a gay couple and very happy together”; “We’re going to a gay bar tonight”;还有一句 “My sister and her ex-wife are divorced”。 可以理解,还是有点文化冲击。 每一部教材都有自己的价值观。 Been on a Duolingo kick these past few days, and a few of the example sentences made me do a double-take: “They are a gay couple and very happy…

  • | | | |

    人心难测–市场调查中的心理游戏

    跟上篇博文写的是同一个演讲,把题目改了。 市场调查中很重要的一步就是研究消费者对所试产品的喜欢程度。Malcolm Gladwell在这个演讲里主要讨论了对消费者喜好揣测所遇到的问题。 Malcolm的演讲是由Areon Chairs的故事展开。 Areon Chairs是一种办公椅。就是下面那样的家伙。 Via SketchUpModels 著名设计师 Bill Stumpf 绞尽脑汁,挖空心思设计出这张革命性的办公椅。Bill 觉得很满意了,就把样品去给人试坐,去做市场调查。调查得到的回复是,椅子的舒适度得分很高,但外观得分却很低。 设计组拿回去做了一点外观的改进,再去做调查。结果还是很多人认为它很丑。 这样的结果意味着Areon Chairs很难卖得出去。 设计组还是把这个产品推出市场–Areon Chairs在4年内成为历史上销售最好的办公椅,并且获奖无数。 这时候,设计组再把这张椅子拿去给以前同一组试用者打分,那些试用者这次对Areon Chairs都打了很高分。 这下麻烦大了。那么多公司屡试不爽的看家本领怎么在这一次就失效了呢?

10 Comments

  1. Interesting observations from the perspective of a Japanese businessman. I haven’t stopped by your blog in awhile, Jacky. I happened to find a link to this story at the Peking Duck.

  2. 博讯网在这里是给封了,好不容易才能上去看看。

    对Roland的翻译,又快又好,我只有佩服的份了。

  3. 我们中国可以生产毫无技术或者低技术的产品,这样的产品现在充斥在全球各个角落,从这个角度来说,中国的确是世界工厂。

    we Chinese can produce production with little or absolutely without technology. Such production flood every corner of the earth. From this respect, we do say “China is the world factory”!!!!!!

  4. Pingback: Business man work

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *