China is not the Factory of the World

– how a Japanese businessman views China

From 在华6年多的日本商人对中国世界工厂的评价

Translated by EPIN and Jacky

I am a typical Japanese businessman called “the economic animal”.  I have been in china for more than 6 years. During these years, I have successively worked and lived in five cities. I can understand Chinese but cannot speak fluently. I can also get general meaning of Chinese words but cannot write. China is called “Factory of the World.” I have my understanding to this. As far as I know, China’s productivity has been improved a lot. However, there is still a long way for China to go to be factory of the world. 

First, factory of the world does not mean the sweatshop. Some people once compared Japanese to ants, but compared with the hardworking Chinese, Japanese are far behind. There are innumerable household factories in Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta as well as Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. These factories are running on backward technologies, similar products, and slack management. They have low technology and poor efficiency. Their only advantage is that they have employees as tough breed as ants, as submissive as cattle and horses. These workers support the survival of these factories. The workers work more than 10 hours a day, staying in shabby rooms and living the lowest life, without basic social security. They are working on the lowest wages all around the world based on hourly rate. In some piece worker factories, the workers’ average working hours are more than 12 hours a day. They won’t stop unless the supervisor forces them to take a break. In my company, there were some Chinese female cleaners. They worked over 10 hours daily quietly with no grumble and never took a day off. They did not have direct supervisor. Not a single person pushed them to do so. They cherished their jobs greatly, just because they earned a bit higher than those in other factories. We were very surprised when hearing that they sent 80% of the earnings back home. To Japanese perspective, the remained money was insufficient to cover their basic living expense, not to mention the rental and the water bill. I had worked in many Southeast Asian countries. It was very difficult to get the workers work overtime even if in an underdeveloped country, such as Burma. Workers would ask for many extra things. In Philippines, workers would never do such hard works. The Filipinos would take one month break after one month’s working, and would not go to work until they used up the money. In Indonesia, there was no one would engage in such hard work. Therefore, in my opinion, these so-called international manufacturers in China are supported by the tough breed Chinese. They cannot survive elsewhere in the world without Chinese. 

Second, factories without skilled workers cannot meet the standard of factory of the world. In the big cities of Southern and Northern China, large quantity of labor force is waiting for the employment. However, there are very few skillful workers. That’s because most Chinese factories are lack of long-term plans and technology support. Many migrant workers keep changing job year after year. They make shoes this year but sewing clothing the other year. The personnel turnover is huge. There is neither efficient management nor basic profession training. Meanwhile, the factories do not have long-term plans, and often rush to manufacture the same best-selling products. So workers have to learn new skills as the production line shifted. Most of the time, factories would fire the existing workers, and then recruit some new from the market. As a result, most workers do not have chances of working in the same field for a long time; therefore they cannot improve their industrial skills. Japan does not dominant in technology development, but it has an unrivaled highly skilled labor force. They have been engaged in the same jobs for tens of years. Their skillful hands produce the most sophisticated products in the world. Higher learning institutes cannot produce such workers, and it is not possible to train one over short time. It takes years to sharpen their skills. Chinese were more skillful. They have produced superb handicrafts. However, the Chinese factories’ employment pattern does not help train the workers. The Chinese workers have been floating like quicksand year by year. They don’t have the conditions to acquire higher skills.

Third, the size of those factories does not reach the standard of world factory. Most of the factories in China are small and many of them are making the same products. In terms of Japanese standards, those can only be called as workshops. They do not meet the standards of industrialization. The Pearl River Delta area is the densest manufacturing area in China, but its total annual production value of all the factories only equals that of one Japanese big size enterprise. Numerous factories are making the same products independently. As a result, the factories do not have enough work to do and the cost of manufacturing is high. Therefore, the enterprises do not have the funding for research team. They do not have money to invest in technology development. At the same time, the enterprises also have no intention to get more advanced technical equipment due to the low cost of the labor force. In Pearl River Delta area, numerous enterprises, big or small, are making low-tech electrical appliances such as television, microwave oven, air conditioner, refrigerator, telephone and so on. There is no one world famous brand. There are factories engaging in rag trade, headwear and footwear and toys. Also, none of them meets the minimum standard of mass production.

Fourth, low-tech factories cannot meet the standard of world factory. A world famous enterprise usually is able to develop products on its own. Also, it can offer comprehensive services from R & D, manufacturing, to marketing, sales and after-sales support. However, most factories in China basically are just imitating. They are acting for others. They are chained by others in technologies. Foreign companies grip most of the profits. The links between the R & D system and the manufacturing system are broken. Chinese companies are weak in developing new products. They come up with very few self-developed products.

Fifth, Chinese factories’ managements are not efficient and does not meet the standard of world factory. A more advanced production demands a more stringent management. Chinese enterprises lack good management. There are much more factories in China than in Japan, but few Chinese factories are able to produce a complete plant. Most of the equipment is imported. In the Chinese factories, those more advanced equipment are all imported from other countries. China has the ability to produce such complete plant, but it lacks of the management skills. The requirement of making complete plants is different from making mass products. There might be only one complete plant sold in several years. It takes a comprehensive management of resources, manufacturers, specifications, standards, etc to make profits. The whole process is as accurate as assembling finest watches. If one component goes wrong in management, it will increase the cost and decrease the performance. China is short of such precise management. The management of the state-own companies is very bureaucratic and inefficient, while the small companies do not practice good management. I think, if the Airbus is produced in China and managed by Chinese, its cost will be much higher. In my opinion, China does not lack of managers. China needs a good filtering system for talents. A lot of incompetent persons who are incapable, vicious and crafty take the high paid positions. They are good at cutting corner. They impede the development of the good managers.

China has unrivaled tough breed labor in the world, but it lacks of skillful industrial workers. China has more factories than any other countries, but none of them is world-class size. Chinese can make all kinds of products, but they produce few innovative products. China has huge productivity, but it is not able to produce high-tech complete plant.

China has a long way to go to become the real factory of the world. For a long time in the future, China will be only a primary products processing base, not the factory of the world.

Similar Posts

  • |

    中国在非洲:还是治理问题,笨蛋

    原文链接:http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4068 翻译:Peipei Yue,Jacky Peng等 审稿:Oiwan (本文原作者Akwe Amosu女士是非洲问题专家。她现在是开放社会研究所华盛顿分所的非洲高级政策分析员。她在尼日利亚长大,并在尼日利亚和英国受教育。她曾在Trust Africa Foundation,AllAfrica Foundation,UN’s Economic Commission,BBC,Financial Times in London and West Africa等机构工作过或是担任高级职位。) 这里是离海岸500英里的热带森林深处。除了中国人,没有其它投资人敢踏足加蓬(Gabon)的这个地方。一个由中国机械设备进出口公司领队的投标团赢得了开发这个加蓬Belinga 大铁矿的合约。为了可以购买所有开采出的铁矿石,中国的工程队除了要在Belinga建采矿设施外,还要建一个给采矿供电的水力发电站,一条通向海边的铁路,和在加蓬首都利伯维尔(Libreville)北边建一个深水港口以出口矿石。 中国不但要投资几十亿美元而且要等至少三年才能真正开采出铁矿。自1955年这个铁矿被发现以来,没有任何一个西方公司来开发这个铁矿。然而,在国家的支持下,中国公司现在迈出了这个充满风险的一步。 中国在非洲的推进让各专家们想起了那些耳熟能详的关于两象相争的故事。他们想当然地认为,在这场东西方的较量中――两象相争――受害的将是非洲大地上的青草。 不过,时代已经不同了。在非洲受到的第一场殖民掠夺中,在谈判桌上只有那些帝国主义者,他们之间商量着就把非洲大陆给瓜分了。现在,非洲已经远不是一个被动的受害人。非洲站到谈判桌前,热切地想达成协议。在这一次开发Belinga铁矿的交易中,中国是与加蓬的现政府进行谈判,而不是加蓬的宗主国–法国。是东方还是西方胜出,这已无需争辩了。 尽管如此,地上的青草还是有可能受到伤害。非洲的人民须要提防外国势力同时也要注意不为他们本国政府所害。非洲政府能有多少代表人民的利益?非洲的谈判水平是否及格?这非常令人怀疑。这些问题的答案最终还是要看非洲能否把中国钞票转化为自身的发展。 中国人所寻求的利益

  • | |

    改变未来IT业发展的趋势

    这篇是埃森哲(Accenture)技术实验室(Accenture Technology Labs)做的研究报告。 埃森哲是IT咨询业的老大之一。他们做的都是政府机构,大公司,大企业的IT项目。这篇文章所说的IT业也应该是指他们所专注企业内的,有“Big Impact”的商业运作IT项目,不是Hopesome,Hung,或幻灭眼里未来的IT世界。 换换口味吧。 这篇文章其实勾起了我一直以来对这些顾问们(Consultant)的“偏见”, 1. 这些IT顾问们写文章喜欢用大词。在他们的演示里,用越大,越学术化的词就越能显示水平。什么SOAs,虚拟化,语意集成…不明就里的话,一下就给吓唬住。其实只要会摆弄自己Blog,能不时加一两个复杂点的插件的人平时都已经在用这些东东了。 不过也难怪这些顾问们写这些技术文档时要象写法律文档那样罗嗦,文档稍微有点漏洞就可能给他们带来百万千万的损失。 2. 这些IT咨询公司应用的技术总是落后于IT技术的发展。我的感觉是至少落后两三年。 当然他们不是要最新的,他们是要最稳定,可靠的技术。这又是他们的米饭班主--客户决定的。 为了这篇翻译,我老早给埃森哲发了电邮询问,看看可不可以给我正式的许可,但直到现在都没有答复。我在想,我的那封电邮是不是叮叮当当的向上传了N级,然后在某一级给卡住了,不可以砰砰邦邦穿过几层下达来回复我。对他们来说,也许还是睁只眼,闭只眼比较省事吧。 哎,大公司,可以理解。 另:翻译的版权没解决,这翻译随时可能要拿下来的。 改变未来IT业发展的趋势 原文:The Major Trends that will Shape IT 翻译:EPIN 审稿:Jacky Peng

  • | | | |

    人心难测–市场调查中的心理游戏

    跟上篇博文写的是同一个演讲,把题目改了。 市场调查中很重要的一步就是研究消费者对所试产品的喜欢程度。Malcolm Gladwell在这个演讲里主要讨论了对消费者喜好揣测所遇到的问题。 Malcolm的演讲是由Areon Chairs的故事展开。 Areon Chairs是一种办公椅。就是下面那样的家伙。 Via SketchUpModels 著名设计师 Bill Stumpf 绞尽脑汁,挖空心思设计出这张革命性的办公椅。Bill 觉得很满意了,就把样品去给人试坐,去做市场调查。调查得到的回复是,椅子的舒适度得分很高,但外观得分却很低。 设计组拿回去做了一点外观的改进,再去做调查。结果还是很多人认为它很丑。 这样的结果意味着Areon Chairs很难卖得出去。 设计组还是把这个产品推出市场–Areon Chairs在4年内成为历史上销售最好的办公椅,并且获奖无数。 这时候,设计组再把这张椅子拿去给以前同一组试用者打分,那些试用者这次对Areon Chairs都打了很高分。 这下麻烦大了。那么多公司屡试不爽的看家本领怎么在这一次就失效了呢?

  • | |

    【转】25个免费英文书库

    免费的中文网上书库有很多。以前零星上过一些免费的英文书库。现在EduChoices来了个总结,不客气,全文转载。 1. The Online Books Page Free Books on the Online Books Page The University of Pennsylvania’s Online Books Page is one of the best places to read free books online. There are more than 30,000 English works available. All of them are formatted nicely and can be read right on your computer. 2. Project…

  • |

    An Angola’s contract leads to investigations in China

    The awareness of stock markets has grown  in last couple of years and amount of people participating in stock trading has grown. Chinese companies are also using the stock market to raise money to fund projects outside China. Chinese construction companies are very active in Africa. So when Hangxiao Steel company announced that have won…

  • | |

    开始Pop!Tech

    本来答应June做一个Pop!Tech 2007的远程现场直播,可惜在开会前不知什么时候被新加坡的毒蚊子叮了一口,中了登革热。Pop!Tech开会的时候躺在医院里看The Mummy。 这登革热着实够毒,出院还要昏昏沉沉睡了两个多礼拜,到这几天才大致感觉打字写博不是件很累的活。 只是错过了现场直播,看着Pop!Tech网站上那长长的密密麻麻的演讲者列表,一下子又不知道从何写起。 先跟着Pop!Tech的官方博客,想到哪,写到哪吧–感觉有点象自言自语–等找到了对翻译Pop!Tech感兴趣的人再一起系统的写。 对于大部分国人来说,语言是要了解Pop!Tech内容的最大障碍。正好June在10月16号的博文中介绍了Pop!Tech网站尝试解决这个问题走出的一个很有创意的也很有意义的一步。 Pop!Tech与dotSub一起合作推出了八种语言版的Pop!Tech视频播客。 Pop!Tech利用dotSub提供的服务,为视频加上不同语言的字幕。这样Pop!Tech的内容就可以跨过语言障碍,传播到全世界。(点这里可以看到中文版。) 资源有限,现在Pop!Tech只为其中八个视频做了字幕。而且,其中中文的翻译,用桑葚的话说,“比较烂,像是机器翻译的”。 对此,Pop!Tech打算把字幕的翻译用wiki完全开放给用户。现在只好将就一下吧。实在受不了的话也可以在上面留言提提意见,Pop!Tech会很快做出改进。 Pop!Tech是一个开放的团体。

10 Comments

  1. Interesting observations from the perspective of a Japanese businessman. I haven’t stopped by your blog in awhile, Jacky. I happened to find a link to this story at the Peking Duck.

  2. 博讯网在这里是给封了,好不容易才能上去看看。

    对Roland的翻译,又快又好,我只有佩服的份了。

  3. 我们中国可以生产毫无技术或者低技术的产品,这样的产品现在充斥在全球各个角落,从这个角度来说,中国的确是世界工厂。

    we Chinese can produce production with little or absolutely without technology. Such production flood every corner of the earth. From this respect, we do say “China is the world factory”!!!!!!

  4. Pingback: Business man work

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *