China is not the Factory of the World

– how a Japanese businessman views China

From 在华6年多的日本商人对中国世界工厂的评价

Translated by EPIN and Jacky

I am a typical Japanese businessman called “the economic animal”.  I have been in china for more than 6 years. During these years, I have successively worked and lived in five cities. I can understand Chinese but cannot speak fluently. I can also get general meaning of Chinese words but cannot write. China is called “Factory of the World.” I have my understanding to this. As far as I know, China’s productivity has been improved a lot. However, there is still a long way for China to go to be factory of the world. 

First, factory of the world does not mean the sweatshop. Some people once compared Japanese to ants, but compared with the hardworking Chinese, Japanese are far behind. There are innumerable household factories in Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta as well as Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. These factories are running on backward technologies, similar products, and slack management. They have low technology and poor efficiency. Their only advantage is that they have employees as tough breed as ants, as submissive as cattle and horses. These workers support the survival of these factories. The workers work more than 10 hours a day, staying in shabby rooms and living the lowest life, without basic social security. They are working on the lowest wages all around the world based on hourly rate. In some piece worker factories, the workers’ average working hours are more than 12 hours a day. They won’t stop unless the supervisor forces them to take a break. In my company, there were some Chinese female cleaners. They worked over 10 hours daily quietly with no grumble and never took a day off. They did not have direct supervisor. Not a single person pushed them to do so. They cherished their jobs greatly, just because they earned a bit higher than those in other factories. We were very surprised when hearing that they sent 80% of the earnings back home. To Japanese perspective, the remained money was insufficient to cover their basic living expense, not to mention the rental and the water bill. I had worked in many Southeast Asian countries. It was very difficult to get the workers work overtime even if in an underdeveloped country, such as Burma. Workers would ask for many extra things. In Philippines, workers would never do such hard works. The Filipinos would take one month break after one month’s working, and would not go to work until they used up the money. In Indonesia, there was no one would engage in such hard work. Therefore, in my opinion, these so-called international manufacturers in China are supported by the tough breed Chinese. They cannot survive elsewhere in the world without Chinese. 

Second, factories without skilled workers cannot meet the standard of factory of the world. In the big cities of Southern and Northern China, large quantity of labor force is waiting for the employment. However, there are very few skillful workers. That’s because most Chinese factories are lack of long-term plans and technology support. Many migrant workers keep changing job year after year. They make shoes this year but sewing clothing the other year. The personnel turnover is huge. There is neither efficient management nor basic profession training. Meanwhile, the factories do not have long-term plans, and often rush to manufacture the same best-selling products. So workers have to learn new skills as the production line shifted. Most of the time, factories would fire the existing workers, and then recruit some new from the market. As a result, most workers do not have chances of working in the same field for a long time; therefore they cannot improve their industrial skills. Japan does not dominant in technology development, but it has an unrivaled highly skilled labor force. They have been engaged in the same jobs for tens of years. Their skillful hands produce the most sophisticated products in the world. Higher learning institutes cannot produce such workers, and it is not possible to train one over short time. It takes years to sharpen their skills. Chinese were more skillful. They have produced superb handicrafts. However, the Chinese factories’ employment pattern does not help train the workers. The Chinese workers have been floating like quicksand year by year. They don’t have the conditions to acquire higher skills.

Third, the size of those factories does not reach the standard of world factory. Most of the factories in China are small and many of them are making the same products. In terms of Japanese standards, those can only be called as workshops. They do not meet the standards of industrialization. The Pearl River Delta area is the densest manufacturing area in China, but its total annual production value of all the factories only equals that of one Japanese big size enterprise. Numerous factories are making the same products independently. As a result, the factories do not have enough work to do and the cost of manufacturing is high. Therefore, the enterprises do not have the funding for research team. They do not have money to invest in technology development. At the same time, the enterprises also have no intention to get more advanced technical equipment due to the low cost of the labor force. In Pearl River Delta area, numerous enterprises, big or small, are making low-tech electrical appliances such as television, microwave oven, air conditioner, refrigerator, telephone and so on. There is no one world famous brand. There are factories engaging in rag trade, headwear and footwear and toys. Also, none of them meets the minimum standard of mass production.

Fourth, low-tech factories cannot meet the standard of world factory. A world famous enterprise usually is able to develop products on its own. Also, it can offer comprehensive services from R & D, manufacturing, to marketing, sales and after-sales support. However, most factories in China basically are just imitating. They are acting for others. They are chained by others in technologies. Foreign companies grip most of the profits. The links between the R & D system and the manufacturing system are broken. Chinese companies are weak in developing new products. They come up with very few self-developed products.

Fifth, Chinese factories’ managements are not efficient and does not meet the standard of world factory. A more advanced production demands a more stringent management. Chinese enterprises lack good management. There are much more factories in China than in Japan, but few Chinese factories are able to produce a complete plant. Most of the equipment is imported. In the Chinese factories, those more advanced equipment are all imported from other countries. China has the ability to produce such complete plant, but it lacks of the management skills. The requirement of making complete plants is different from making mass products. There might be only one complete plant sold in several years. It takes a comprehensive management of resources, manufacturers, specifications, standards, etc to make profits. The whole process is as accurate as assembling finest watches. If one component goes wrong in management, it will increase the cost and decrease the performance. China is short of such precise management. The management of the state-own companies is very bureaucratic and inefficient, while the small companies do not practice good management. I think, if the Airbus is produced in China and managed by Chinese, its cost will be much higher. In my opinion, China does not lack of managers. China needs a good filtering system for talents. A lot of incompetent persons who are incapable, vicious and crafty take the high paid positions. They are good at cutting corner. They impede the development of the good managers.

China has unrivaled tough breed labor in the world, but it lacks of skillful industrial workers. China has more factories than any other countries, but none of them is world-class size. Chinese can make all kinds of products, but they produce few innovative products. China has huge productivity, but it is not able to produce high-tech complete plant.

China has a long way to go to become the real factory of the world. For a long time in the future, China will be only a primary products processing base, not the factory of the world.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    【转】25个免费英文书库

    免费的中文网上书库有很多。以前零星上过一些免费的英文书库。现在EduChoices来了个总结,不客气,全文转载。 1. The Online Books Page Free Books on the Online Books Page The University of Pennsylvania’s Online Books Page is one of the best places to read free books online. There are more than 30,000 English works available. All of them are formatted nicely and can be read right on your computer. 2. Project…

  • | |

    Joost,五万个DVD画质的在线电视频道!

     一早就收到Isaac发给我的Joost的测试邀请。原来Joost的来头不小,它是Janus Friis和Niklas Zennstrom这对黄金搭档的又一惊人之作。 Janus Friis和Niklas Zennstrom是Kazaa和Skype的创始人。他们把Skype卖给了eBay,拿了26亿美刀后没有跑去沙滩晒太阳,休长假。去年他们就秘密开始了一个叫威尼斯的计划,目标是要把电视搬到网上。 这个威尼斯计划就是现在的Joost(念Juiced)。最近和YouTube闹别扭的Viacom却与Joost签了约,为Joost提供电视节目。世界最大的电视节目代理JumpTV据说也快要跟Joost签约了。 和YouTube不同,Joost播的全是电视节目,没有用户上传的功能,走一个不同的路线。 现在Joost上的节目不多,但预计10年内它就能吸引到5万个电视频道转播。 初步试了一下,用户界面不算复杂。也许国内网络的原因,画面有停顿,不过可以暂停播放,等下载完再看。画质确实很不错。 我想对Joost最担心的应该不是YouTube。Joost如果成功了,有多少人还需要买卫星电视节目,还需要装付费有线电视? 在客厅了装一台大屏幕的电脑就行了。

  • |

    “可读写”网络上的“真”新闻

    当回应外界对他和王菲的孩子裂唇的种种猜测,议论时,李亚鹏在那篇感动天下父母的《感谢》里写了这么一段话, …在这段时间的实际接触中,更多的知情者(算不上是我们的朋友,甚至是素不相识的人)表现出令人尊敬的教养和善良。善良也许不存在于少数有话语权的报端与网络,却依然存在于芸芸众生中。我感激而欣慰。 而最近独钓寒江雪对这段时间闹得沸沸扬扬的庞加莱猜想解证的评论中有这么一段话也挑起了我的那一根弦, …永远站在道德制高点的网络暴民,关心的从来不是事实真相,而且任何可以表现自己卓尔不群的机会。在这个坐在屏幕背后就可以指点江山的年代,人人都是最伟大的思想家。 风马牛不相及的两段话背后包含着对草根声音两种截然不同的态度。 对于草根媒体,是“群众的眼睛是雪亮的”,还是“很多事情,专家才有发言权”呢? 《We the media》这本书已经出了有段时间了,还可以免费下载。这本书的中文翻译《草根媒體》也有了。对草根媒体的作用还有很多不同的看法。 很多媒体工作者认为,博客,播客等等是对报纸,电视,电台的有益补充;草根媒体是对主流媒体的有益补充。但这仅是补充而已,有了更好,没有也无所谓。我甚至听到有的新闻系的教授说,博客只是个人表现欲的发泄,对新闻的发展没有什么益处。 每个人的背景和经验都不尽相同,所以得出的结论也不同。 即将到香港大学新闻系任教的Rebecca,她在“Real” Journalism on the Read-Write Web(“可读写”网络上的“真”新闻)一文中指出, …”真正的“新闻工作实际上已从主流媒扩散到可读写网络上去了。 Rebecca现在是哈佛法学院的Research Fellow,曾任CNN的Beijing Bureau Chief (1998-2001), and Tokyo Bureau Chief ( 2001-2003)。她是全球之声(Global Voices Online)的创始人。 她认为, “真正的新闻工作应该是为公众提供他们需要知道的信息。” 在这个前提下,当今的新闻如果没有吸收草根媒体的贡献就很难成其为“真”新闻了。 要求中国的媒体做“真正的新闻工作”也许有点勉为其难。不过Rebecca的这篇《“可读写”网络上的“真”新闻》有很多新闻工作者与草根媒体互动的经历与体验,可以帮我们从另一个角度去理解博客等草根媒体。翻译这篇文章也正好为全球之声赢得Knight Batten Excellence in Journalism Grand Prize这个大奖献上一点点贺礼吧。 “可读写”网络上的“真”新闻 原文链接:“Real” Journalism on the Read-Write Web 原文作者:Rebecca MacKinnon 翻译:Abby; Jacky 校对:Jacky 哥伦比亚大学新闻学院院长 Nick…

  • |

    An Angola’s contract leads to investigations in China

    The awareness of stock markets has grown  in last couple of years and amount of people participating in stock trading has grown. Chinese companies are also using the stock market to raise money to fund projects outside China. Chinese construction companies are very active in Africa. So when Hangxiao Steel company announced that have won…

  • |

    液氮制雪糕

    以做草莓雪糕为例: 1. 把草莓,Cream,糖等等所有调料倒入果汁机里打成雪糕汁; 2. 把打好的雪糕汁倒入不锈钢容器; 3. 倒入液氮同时用搅拌机不停搅拌; 大约一分钟,雪糕汁变成雪糕就大功告成了。 听起来有点象天方夜谭,做起来很简单—-当然,前提是要有合适的工具。 除感叹美国人的疯狂创意,还思量着这种极速冻成的雪糕口感,应该和在冰箱里制造的普通雪糕有很大不同吧。其实液氮的价钱并不贵,卖液氮雪糕也许是一门不错的生意。 On Networks 的 Food Science 节目上还有其它的一些很Geek的烹饪点子,比如象下面这个, 吹焰管烤肉 不知道下次会不会来个用电子对撞机煎鱼。 难说。

10 Comments

  1. Interesting observations from the perspective of a Japanese businessman. I haven’t stopped by your blog in awhile, Jacky. I happened to find a link to this story at the Peking Duck.

  2. 博讯网在这里是给封了,好不容易才能上去看看。

    对Roland的翻译,又快又好,我只有佩服的份了。

  3. 我们中国可以生产毫无技术或者低技术的产品,这样的产品现在充斥在全球各个角落,从这个角度来说,中国的确是世界工厂。

    we Chinese can produce production with little or absolutely without technology. Such production flood every corner of the earth. From this respect, we do say “China is the world factory”!!!!!!

  4. Pingback: Business man work

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *