|

Movie review: 12 Weeks With Geeks

It is a documentary about a software project development. Four interns worked in the Fog Creek Software for the Copilot project. They worked for 3 months and delivered the first version of the application.

I learnt about Fog Creek Software from the book and the blog Joel On Software. The book gives some very interesting and enlightening explanations on software engineering and project management.

I expected that I could find out from this movie in details how Joel led a team to develop software, web application particularly. I’d thought this movie would show me something like collecting user specifications, making plan, working on code, fixing bugs and so on. But the movie actually is about the life and thoughts of the developers. You can not learn project management skills from this movie. Rather, it is about what makes a dream office, team, or life to geeks, the software developers here.

Though they kept saying they have to work over night, long hours, they all looked very happy and satisfied. They had very nice workstations, though lack of privacy, and comfortable dorms. They grew tomato, went jogging, and had parties. They made fun out of samll or senseless things in life. For example, they tried hard to figure out whether they could escape the building by jumping to the next block in case of fire.

The movie gives me some senses of how the start-up gets started in the US too. But it does not go deep into that. It does not show how and where you can get funds or what you should do after complete the development.

Overall, it is an interesting movie. I would suggest the viewers to read the Joel On Software before or after the movie.

The driving force (for the hackers) is usually a combination of the desire to get rich, the desire for power, and the desire to sort of make something. And they (are) kind of overlap. – from the movie.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    疯狂的石头,疯狂的梦

    第一次是在播客宝典上看到介绍《疯狂的石头》的短片。 看到那“豆干”秘书指着汽车BMW的牌子扯起嗓子,盛气凌人地说, ”你没看到吗?--别!摸!我!“ 一阵由幽默卷着的对现实的深刻批判扑面而来:我一下子就喜欢上这部影片了。 却没有想到这部片是由刘德华投资的,更没想到这块石头是刘德华要振兴中国电影这个疯狂的梦的一部分。 看过不少刘德华演的戏,但总感到他演得有点造作,不如发哥,伟仔自然,当然也没有星爷那般搞笑。论起唱歌,他没有学友的唱功,比不上黎明青春,又不能学不了城城在台上像蚱蜢一般的蹦跳。他前几年的《笨小孩》、《木鱼》我倒听得挺有味道,但是在我脑中还是改不了他靠外型吃饭,只会赚钱的印象。 亚洲周刊对刘德华的访谈改变了我的看法--原来他有这么一个疯狂的梦。他对这个梦不但有坚定、执着的追求,而且还有周详、可行的计划。 瘋狂石頭戲內戲外敲打中國瘋狂的心

  • | |

    来一段不让播的相声

    在烧海那里看到这段郭德纲的相声节选。 流言跟新闻分不清;电影跟广告分不清;杀手跟大夫分不清;贼跟官员分不清;要饭的跟大老板分不清;妓女跟明星分不清;流氓跟导演分不清;流氓跟警察分不清。 --好的,坏的分不清。这就是现在的中国。 不罗嗦了,看片吧。  

  • |

    Sir Ken Robinson 在TED上的精彩演讲

    Sir Ken Robinson是一个著名的演讲家。他主要关心在商业及教育领域的创新与改革。他认为不断的创新才能成功。 在这次TED的演讲中,他认为世界上现有的教育系统是19世纪工业化的产物,已经不能适应当今世界的发展。他主张对现有的教育系统来个彻底改革,要把创新能力列为教育的目标之一,与教育文化相提并重。 相信绝大部分人对他的英式幽默都很受用,睿智而发人深省。只是我有点跟不上他重重的英国口音。 另外,对于他讲的笑话要有比较全面的西方文化背景才能完全听懂。比如他讲的有关Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh的笑话,我是问了Tinker, tailor才搞清楚,虽然我自认读过不少圣经故事。 演讲精句: All kids have tremendous talent, and we squander them. 所有的孩子都有非凡的天赋,只是我们把它们浪费了。 Creativity now is as important in education as literacy; we should treat it with the same status. 创造力在当今的教育中应该与文化并重,我们应当对它们同等重视。 …if you are not prepared to be wrong, you will never come up with anything original….

  • | |

    Wikinomics-维基经济

    想来想去,还是应该给Wikinomics一个译名。Google来Google去,觉得译成维基经济最为贴切了。 我看到最早把Wikinomics译成维基经济的是在维基百科上粤语版的这一篇, http://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikinomics_(%E6%9B%B8) 台湾《立报》上的这篇 無本經營 寫部落格有賺頭 介绍得更有趣些,不过就晚了一点了。

2 Comments

  1. “I’d thought this movie would show me something like collecting user specifications, making plan, working on code, fixing bugs and so on.”

    the nature of copilot is such that there’s no real need to go out and collect user specs, since the users are sort of the developers themselves (the helper users). also, if too much is covered on coding and debugging, the movie will be less interesting to a lot of viewers.

    their segment on usability testing was quite interesting though.

  2. I believe they had the specs for this project even if the developers were the users. Otherwise, they would have got lost as the development moving ahead and getting bigger.

    You are right, “if too much is covered on coding and debugging, the movie will be less interesting…” However, those are indispensable in software development. The movie could help viewers understand better about the developers’ life If it included the real development process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *