小记一二

两天前去印尼廖内走了一趟。

前段时间在网上看到不少对近期印尼发展的描述,这次亲身体会,印象深刻。感觉尽管印尼还有很多困难(雅加达正在闹水灾,已经接近瘟疫流行的边缘),它正逐渐从民主乱象中走出来,迎向发展的春天。

民主对经济发展是有利还是有害?真希望印尼可以做出个另一个正面的例子来。记得在上世纪八、九十年代的时候,印尼的人均GDP一直是比中国高的,到现在却是比中国的人均GDP落后了一大截。

昨晚参加了两个有趣的聚会。

一个是Second Life新加坡用户第一次在现实生活的会面。

这次聚会是由IdeaFactoryEng KiatNicholas组织的。IdeaFactory现在是Second Life在新加坡的临时联络处,他们透露Second Life将在近期正式进军新加坡,而且将以新加坡为中心,发展Second Life在亚洲(除日本与韩国)的业务。新加坡经济发展局(EDB)也将资助一批新加坡人到旧金山Second Life总部去培训,帮助Second Life在新加坡的业务发展。

这对新加坡本地的数字媒体开发是个很好的消息。可以预见Second Life的这个中心将刺激新加坡成立很多以Second Life业务为主的公司。对亚洲其它地区而言,Second Life离他们更靠近了一步,应该会更容易听到亚洲用户的声音。

昨晚参加完Second Life的聚会后,匆忙赶回家,正好赶上Interlocals的网上讨论。

我一直关注着Oiwan创立的这个网站,很早就在上面登记了帐号,有几次都差点想把我的翻译发给他们,只是我的little bridge比较关注文化交流上的小事,而Interlocals专注于人权,民主,社会转变等大事,感觉little bridge有点配不上Interlocals的大框架。

我是以旁观者的身份参加这次网上的讨论。看着与会者积极地讨论Interlocals遇到的问题,很为这些志愿工作者的热情而感动。这世界上真的有不少人不求名利,只为帮助人而付出。

Interlocals主要是由几个香港志愿工作者创立的。

我在新加坡也参加了一些志愿团体,但总感觉新加坡这边的本地志愿工作者缺乏真正的热情--他们的热情大多都很肤浅,暖不到人心里。奇怪的是,我感觉香港是一个比新加坡更商业化,更资本主义,更符合适者生存丛林法则的地方,但我却能经常遇到充满热情的香港志愿工作者。也许一个冷漠的地方更需要热情的人来温暖,要不然每个人都变成巨大商业机器上的一个个冷酷的零件了。

参加Interlocals网上讨论的另一个收获是,在little bridge上加上了Creative Common的声明。我以前对这个一直都不重视,总以为blog通常默认就是Creative Common的了。

How China is viewed in Africa?

One year ago, we saw China was competing with the US for African hearts and minds based on a BBC poll. Not long after that BBC poll, International Herald Leader, a subsidiary weekly of Xinhua News Agency, started a survey on how African view China. It took them five months to complete the survey.

We have conducted the survey with 121 representatives in some African countries, and 32 mainstream media of 16 African countries.  

It is a rather comprehensive survey.

I am glad that International Herald Leader grants me the right to translate and publish the survey report here, so that we can have one more different voice besides BBC. I believe this can also help people understand how China sees Africa.

 

A Survey of African’s Views On China

Original post: 《中国在非洲形象调查》 by International Herald Leader《国际先驱导报》

Translators: EPIN

Editor: Cathy and Jacky Peng

This year (2006) marks the 50th anniversary of the inauguration of diplomatic ties between new China and African countries. Although China and Africa are far away from each other, friendship and cooperation between China and Africa are long-standing. In half a century, friendship between China and Africa has been constantly consolidated and developed against the test of time. 

In former days, China was benignly called by African countries as their “Big Brother”. So, how do the Africans and African media view China today? What image does China have in their eyes today? 

To get the answer, 16 Africa-based branch agencies of International Herald Leader work with the Global Issues Research Centre of the Xinhua News Agency for a research. The research started in mid-May this year (2006). In 5 months, we have conducted the survey with 121 representatives in some African countries, and 32 mainstream media of 16 African countries. We have interviewed with overseas Chinese, Chinese expats in Africa and Chinese African experts. In the end, we can have a relatively clear understanding of how African view China at present. We can better understand the problems and reasons behind such view. 

This survey involves 16 countries: Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria, Zambia, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethel compare Asia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Senegal, Cameroon, Gabon, Cote D’Ivoire, Angola, Egypt, Sudan, Algeria. 

China in African’s heart: China has nothing do with “New Colonism.”

The African not only highly appreciate China’s achievements since the implementation of the reform and open policy, but also are very pleased to see a flourishing and prosperous China.  Continue reading How China is viewed in Africa?

关于韩国的历史教科书

前段时间我在很多论坛上看到有关韩国历史教科书的帖子。

http://cn.bbs.yahoo.com/message/read_funny_741345.html
http://bbs.military.china.com/jsp/pub/staticFile/htmls/2006/10/1011/5893993_page0.html http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/read.php?tid=81274
http://military.club.china.com/jsp/pub/staticFile/htmls/2006/12/1011/6848404_page0.html http://free.21cn.com/forum/bbsMessageList.act?currentPage=1&bbsThreadId=1528356
http://bbs.wenxin8.com/read.php?tid=87621
http://bbs.military.china.com/jsp/pub/staticFile/htmls/2006/10/1011/5893993_page0.html http://bbs6.news.163.com/board/rep2.jsp?b=zhongri&i=982873

这些帖子大多数都用了一些相同的扫描图,象下面这一幅。(在这里看更多的图)

1dfc9d6d1e36a9e6ba105e0c0ae4c175

我们伟大唐朝的领土在这副所谓韩国的历史教科书里被挤到西南的一角。这激起国人无限的爱国热情,对如此“无耻”的韩国当然就没有什么好话了。

姑且不论历史遗留下来的问题,这些图到底是不是真正的韩国教科书?

我就此问了一个韩国人朋友,得到了一个否定的答案。

看来是有人搅浑水。

我不懂韩文,只好用英文发了这一篇Are these from the real Korean textbook?,问一下到底这些图是怎么回事。

关注韩国的英文网站The Marmot’s Hole作出回应R. Elgin写道, Continue reading 关于韩国的历史教科书

中国为何支持缅甸?

最近中国不惜动用在联合国的否决权否决缅甸问题决议草案

据我在这边接触到的一些了解缅甸的人说,由于中国长期对缅甸军政府的支持,缅甸有很多年轻人都有反华的情绪。

跟很多中国人一样,我一直都不了解中国对缅甸的外交政策,只是偶尔听说中国在缅甸建海军基地。在印度洋建个海军基地,让人感觉是对付印度的。

另外,中国还要利用缅甸建一条从印度洋到昆明的输油管道

所以中国支持缅甸军政府是为了与印度争夺中南半岛控制权?为了另一条石油通道?

看到万维网上有一篇对中国行使否决权支持缅甸的详细分析,角度跟我以前看到的很不一样。另外这篇文字还解释了很多人都半懂不懂的联合国表决条例。

因为国内上不了万维网,就在这里存了这篇文字,方便大家。

 

中南半岛风云骤变 中国为何拼命支持缅甸?【转】

Are these from the real Korean textbook?

Recently, there are quite a number of posts about Korean history textbook come up in the Chinese BBSs. Most of the posts show the similar list of pictures. See the links below and the pictures taken from the BBSs in the bottom.

http://cn.bbs.yahoo.com/message/read_funny_741345.html
http://bbs.military.china.com/jsp/pub/staticFile/htmls/2006/10/1011/5893993_page0.html
http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/read.php?tid=81274
http://military.club.china.com/jsp/pub/staticFile/htmls/2006/12/1011/6848404_page0.html
http://free.21cn.com/forum/bbsMessageList.act?currentPage=1&bbsThreadId=1528356
http://bbs.wenxin8.com/read.php?tid=87621
http://bbs.military.china.com/jsp/pub/staticFile/htmls/2006/10/1011/5893993_page0.html
http://bbs6.news.163.com/board/rep2.jsp?b=zhongri&i=982873

In 2005, South Korea successfully got Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage proclamation for its Gangneung Danoje Festival (Dano Festival) from UNESCO. The Dano Festival falls on the same day of the the Chinese Dragon Boat Festival. Many Chinese believe the Dano Festival comes from the Chinese Dragon Boat Festival, therefore they accuse Korean of stealing the title of that heritage from China.  

This time someone dug out a Korean history textbook, scanned and posted on the Chinese BBSs. These historical maps, which show ancient Korean had occupied big part of the Chinese territory,  are completely different from what Chinese learn in the schools. This inevitably spurred some uproars on Chinese BBSs. They’re bashing Korean for distorting the history and trying to steal Chinese land.

What intriguing me is, one of my Korean friend told me that she had never seen such a Korean history textbook in Korean.

I am not in a position to verify the validity of the history here. I see the problem of cross-cultural communication again in these posts.

The information of these posts may be wrong, but none of the Chinese is able/willing to verify this troll. The animosity to Korean is seeded by these posts on the China side, while people in Korean have no clue of what is happening.

Can anyone tell me these are real Korean history textbook? If it is, what is the book talking about?

I hope Korean can join the conversation.

If there is a fight, let’s fight on the net. By all means, a web war is better than any real war.

 

1dfc9d6d1e36a9e6ba105e0c0ae4c175

Continue reading Are these from the real Korean textbook?