China is not the Factory of the World

– how a Japanese businessman views China

From 在华6年多的日本商人对中国世界工厂的评价

Translated by EPIN and Jacky

I am a typical Japanese businessman called “the economic animal”.  I have been in china for more than 6 years. During these years, I have successively worked and lived in five cities. I can understand Chinese but cannot speak fluently. I can also get general meaning of Chinese words but cannot write. China is called “Factory of the World.” I have my understanding to this. As far as I know, China’s productivity has been improved a lot. However, there is still a long way for China to go to be factory of the world. 

First, factory of the world does not mean the sweatshop. Some people once compared Japanese to ants, but compared with the hardworking Chinese, Japanese are far behind. There are innumerable household factories in Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta as well as Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. These factories are running on backward technologies, similar products, and slack management. They have low technology and poor efficiency. Their only advantage is that they have employees as tough breed as ants, as submissive as cattle and horses. These workers support the survival of these factories. The workers work more than 10 hours a day, staying in shabby rooms and living the lowest life, without basic social security. They are working on the lowest wages all around the world based on hourly rate. In some piece worker factories, the workers’ average working hours are more than 12 hours a day. They won’t stop unless the supervisor forces them to take a break. In my company, there were some Chinese female cleaners. They worked over 10 hours daily quietly with no grumble and never took a day off. They did not have direct supervisor. Not a single person pushed them to do so. They cherished their jobs greatly, just because they earned a bit higher than those in other factories. We were very surprised when hearing that they sent 80% of the earnings back home. To Japanese perspective, the remained money was insufficient to cover their basic living expense, not to mention the rental and the water bill. I had worked in many Southeast Asian countries. It was very difficult to get the workers work overtime even if in an underdeveloped country, such as Burma. Workers would ask for many extra things. In Philippines, workers would never do such hard works. The Filipinos would take one month break after one month’s working, and would not go to work until they used up the money. In Indonesia, there was no one would engage in such hard work. Therefore, in my opinion, these so-called international manufacturers in China are supported by the tough breed Chinese. They cannot survive elsewhere in the world without Chinese. 

Second, factories without skilled workers cannot meet the standard of factory of the world. In the big cities of Southern and Northern China, large quantity of labor force is waiting for the employment. However, there are very few skillful workers. That’s because most Chinese factories are lack of long-term plans and technology support. Many migrant workers keep changing job year after year. They make shoes this year but sewing clothing the other year. The personnel turnover is huge. There is neither efficient management nor basic profession training. Meanwhile, the factories do not have long-term plans, and often rush to manufacture the same best-selling products. So workers have to learn new skills as the production line shifted. Most of the time, factories would fire the existing workers, and then recruit some new from the market. As a result, most workers do not have chances of working in the same field for a long time; therefore they cannot improve their industrial skills. Japan does not dominant in technology development, but it has an unrivaled highly skilled labor force. They have been engaged in the same jobs for tens of years. Their skillful hands produce the most sophisticated products in the world. Higher learning institutes cannot produce such workers, and it is not possible to train one over short time. It takes years to sharpen their skills. Chinese were more skillful. They have produced superb handicrafts. However, the Chinese factories’ employment pattern does not help train the workers. The Chinese workers have been floating like quicksand year by year. They don’t have the conditions to acquire higher skills.

Third, the size of those factories does not reach the standard of world factory. Most of the factories in China are small and many of them are making the same products. In terms of Japanese standards, those can only be called as workshops. They do not meet the standards of industrialization. The Pearl River Delta area is the densest manufacturing area in China, but its total annual production value of all the factories only equals that of one Japanese big size enterprise. Numerous factories are making the same products independently. As a result, the factories do not have enough work to do and the cost of manufacturing is high. Therefore, the enterprises do not have the funding for research team. They do not have money to invest in technology development. At the same time, the enterprises also have no intention to get more advanced technical equipment due to the low cost of the labor force. In Pearl River Delta area, numerous enterprises, big or small, are making low-tech electrical appliances such as television, microwave oven, air conditioner, refrigerator, telephone and so on. There is no one world famous brand. There are factories engaging in rag trade, headwear and footwear and toys. Also, none of them meets the minimum standard of mass production.

Fourth, low-tech factories cannot meet the standard of world factory. A world famous enterprise usually is able to develop products on its own. Also, it can offer comprehensive services from R & D, manufacturing, to marketing, sales and after-sales support. However, most factories in China basically are just imitating. They are acting for others. They are chained by others in technologies. Foreign companies grip most of the profits. The links between the R & D system and the manufacturing system are broken. Chinese companies are weak in developing new products. They come up with very few self-developed products.

Fifth, Chinese factories’ managements are not efficient and does not meet the standard of world factory. A more advanced production demands a more stringent management. Chinese enterprises lack good management. There are much more factories in China than in Japan, but few Chinese factories are able to produce a complete plant. Most of the equipment is imported. In the Chinese factories, those more advanced equipment are all imported from other countries. China has the ability to produce such complete plant, but it lacks of the management skills. The requirement of making complete plants is different from making mass products. There might be only one complete plant sold in several years. It takes a comprehensive management of resources, manufacturers, specifications, standards, etc to make profits. The whole process is as accurate as assembling finest watches. If one component goes wrong in management, it will increase the cost and decrease the performance. China is short of such precise management. The management of the state-own companies is very bureaucratic and inefficient, while the small companies do not practice good management. I think, if the Airbus is produced in China and managed by Chinese, its cost will be much higher. In my opinion, China does not lack of managers. China needs a good filtering system for talents. A lot of incompetent persons who are incapable, vicious and crafty take the high paid positions. They are good at cutting corner. They impede the development of the good managers.

China has unrivaled tough breed labor in the world, but it lacks of skillful industrial workers. China has more factories than any other countries, but none of them is world-class size. Chinese can make all kinds of products, but they produce few innovative products. China has huge productivity, but it is not able to produce high-tech complete plant.

China has a long way to go to become the real factory of the world. For a long time in the future, China will be only a primary products processing base, not the factory of the world.

Similar Posts

  • |

    如何才能泡到一个日本妞?

    只要把下面幻灯片的要点牢记心中并融汇贯通并举一反三并结合实际即可。 How To Date A Japanese Girl View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: barcampbangkok2 barcamp) 这是在曼谷的日本美女31o5亲作的秘笈。 许多人认为此秘笈是符合生活经验,不可多得的。 It works for Chinese girls too. 中国愤愤除外。

  • | | | |

    绿色是什么意思?

    托马斯·弗里德曼(Thomas Friedman)在这个演讲里讲述了他对当前能源危机的看法,并且给出了他心目中“绿色”的定义。 他认为,当前的能源危机和以往的不同,原因主要是, 1. 地缘政治发展跟以前不同了。 2. 世界是平的。当中国,俄罗斯等发展中国家起飞的同时,世界正以前所未有的速度消耗能源。 3. 中国将要变绿。能源的限制将迫使中国大规模地采用节能技术,因此,中国将变绿,中国将不得不变绿。中国一旦掌握了绿色技术就会对美国的领导地位发起更直接的挑战。 绿色中国比红色中国对美国更有威胁! 4. 根据石油政治学的第一定律(First law of petrolpolitic),石油政治会腐蚀正常的地缘政治。老弗认为,中国阻止联合国出兵处理苏丹的种族清洗就是一个典型的正常政治受到石油政治腐蚀的例子。 顺便提一下,石油政治学的第一定律是老弗首创的一个观点。 这个定律的基本观点是:自由的发展速度与石油价格成反比。 比如,伊朗发生宗教革命了,中东变得漆黑一片了,自由无望了,石油价格最高;当柏林墙倒了,苏联解体了,大家伙满街自由跳舞了,嘿,原油价格16美刀一桶。(便宜得可以买几桶回家用来洗澡,还不用担心有蓝藻。) 这个定律应该是老弗在这个演讲里的一个重点了。 5. 环球经济的网络化。 最后,老弗把“绿色”定义为,Geo-political, geo-strategic, and capitalistic。注意,都是褒义词。 Green is the new red, white and blue. 绿色是新的红色,白色和蓝色。 张亮听了老弗的演讲后觉得他比较象骗子。也许那是商业演讲的一个通病吧。 从老弗的专栏,演讲来看,他的观点很独到,而且,他还能经常创造出各种简单,时髦而又容易理解的词句来。 至少是一个极有创意的人。 PopTech, Thomas Friedman, Energy Crisis, Pop!Tech, Green

  • | |

    Joost,五万个DVD画质的在线电视频道!

     一早就收到Isaac发给我的Joost的测试邀请。原来Joost的来头不小,它是Janus Friis和Niklas Zennstrom这对黄金搭档的又一惊人之作。 Janus Friis和Niklas Zennstrom是Kazaa和Skype的创始人。他们把Skype卖给了eBay,拿了26亿美刀后没有跑去沙滩晒太阳,休长假。去年他们就秘密开始了一个叫威尼斯的计划,目标是要把电视搬到网上。 这个威尼斯计划就是现在的Joost(念Juiced)。最近和YouTube闹别扭的Viacom却与Joost签了约,为Joost提供电视节目。世界最大的电视节目代理JumpTV据说也快要跟Joost签约了。 和YouTube不同,Joost播的全是电视节目,没有用户上传的功能,走一个不同的路线。 现在Joost上的节目不多,但预计10年内它就能吸引到5万个电视频道转播。 初步试了一下,用户界面不算复杂。也许国内网络的原因,画面有停顿,不过可以暂停播放,等下载完再看。画质确实很不错。 我想对Joost最担心的应该不是YouTube。Joost如果成功了,有多少人还需要买卫星电视节目,还需要装付费有线电视? 在客厅了装一台大屏幕的电脑就行了。

  • Culture Shock, Courtesy of Duolingo

    这几天在玩多邻国。连着碰到几个例句, “They are a gay couple and very happy together”; “We’re going to a gay bar tonight”;还有一句 “My sister and her ex-wife are divorced”。 可以理解,还是有点文化冲击。 每一部教材都有自己的价值观。 Been on a Duolingo kick these past few days, and a few of the example sentences made me do a double-take: “They are a gay couple and very happy…

10 Comments

  1. Interesting observations from the perspective of a Japanese businessman. I haven’t stopped by your blog in awhile, Jacky. I happened to find a link to this story at the Peking Duck.

  2. 博讯网在这里是给封了,好不容易才能上去看看。

    对Roland的翻译,又快又好,我只有佩服的份了。

  3. 我们中国可以生产毫无技术或者低技术的产品,这样的产品现在充斥在全球各个角落,从这个角度来说,中国的确是世界工厂。

    we Chinese can produce production with little or absolutely without technology. Such production flood every corner of the earth. From this respect, we do say “China is the world factory”!!!!!!

  4. Pingback: Business man work

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *